That is why, I tried to implement using existing API.

package jp.develop.tool.servlet;

import java.io.Serializable;
import java.util.ArrayList;
import java.util.Collections;
import java.util.List;

import javax.servlet.http.HttpSession;
import javax.servlet.http.HttpSessionActivationListener;
import javax.servlet.http.HttpSessionEvent;
import javax.servlet.http.HttpSessionListener;

/**
 * Session list providing Listener.
 */
public class SessionListListener implements HttpSessionListener, HttpSessionActivationListener, Serializable {

	private static final boolean DEBUG = true;
	private static final long serialVersionUID = 7490899888824580726L;
	private static final String SESSION_LISTENER_KEY = "_sessionListListener";

	private static Object lock = new Object();
	private static List sessions = new ArrayList();
	private static List sessionsForOutput = Collections.unmodifiableList(sessions);

	/**
	 * Get all sessions.
	 * @return All sessions list.
	 */
	public static List getSessions() {
		return sessionsForOutput;
	}

	/**
     * Default Constructor.
     */
    public SessionListListener() {
    	log(String.format("Session List Listener is initialized."));
    }

	/**
     * @see HttpSessionListener#sessionCreated(HttpSessionEvent)
     */
    public void sessionCreated(HttpSessionEvent event) {
    	synchronized (lock) {
    		HttpSession session = event.getSession();
    		session.setAttribute(SESSION_LISTENER_KEY, this);
        	sessions.add(session);
        	log(String.format("Session Added: %s", session.getId()));
		}
    }

    /**
     * @see HttpSessionListener#sessionDestroyed(HttpSessionEvent)
     */
    public void sessionDestroyed(HttpSessionEvent event) {
    	synchronized (lock) {
    		HttpSession session = event.getSession();
    		session.removeAttribute(SESSION_LISTENER_KEY);
        	sessions.remove(session);		// XXX May not good implementation for performance.
        	log(String.format("Session Removed: %s", session.getId()));
		}
    }

    /**
     * @see HttpSessionActivationListener#sessionDidActivate(HttpSessionEvent)
     */
    public void sessionDidActivate(HttpSessionEvent event) {
    	synchronized (lock) {
    		HttpSession session = event.getSession();
        	sessions.add(session);
        	log(String.format("Session Activate: %s", session.getId()));
		}
    }

	/**
     * @see HttpSessionActivationListener#sessionWillPassivate(HttpSessionEvent)
     */
    public void sessionWillPassivate(HttpSessionEvent event) {
    	synchronized (lock) {
    		HttpSession session = event.getSession();
        	sessions.remove(session);		// XXX May not good implementation for performance.
        	log(String.format("Session Passivate: %s", session.getId()));
		}
    }

	private static void log(String message) {
    	if (DEBUG) {
    		System.out.println(message);
    	}
	}
}

If anybody find a problem, please let me know…

But it looks possible…At least, my test code is working…
Anyway, I need rewrite my code for better structure.

Fixed details.

Target File: ‘wp-content/themes/arjuna-x/templates/comments/reply-form-advanced.php’

  Wrong: <?php esc_attr(…
  Correct: <?php echo esc_attr(…

There are 7 same mistakes…

I found that this site design is not good for my purpose.
I’m trying to change site design…

http://amf48.develop.jp/en/document/gae

In case of using GAE, we may not need BlazeDS any more?

I will attach these documents. (sorry for japanese only…)

The Truth of AMF3(PPTX)
The Truth of AMF3(PDF)